bob
Registration Date: 01.01.1970
Posts:
|
|
|
09.10.2009 07:24 |
|
i-p
Super Moderator
Registration Date: 14.01.2006
Posts: 4775
|
|
|
09.10.2009 09:26 |
|
bob
Registration Date: 01.01.1970
Posts:
|
|
|
09.10.2009 18:23 |
|
Dia
Premium Account
Registration Date: 03.03.2006
Posts: 1443
|
|
RE: Phone can't connect to PBXes - www down as well? |
|
Hey bobmats,
Don't get me wrong, since I agree with most of what you mentioned in your last post. PBXes should have had redundant nameservers, the outage should have been communicated better, this is not just an amateur's testing PBX platform, but a corporate type PBX replacement solution, especially for distributed workforce companies. I also had customers which were affected by the DNS outage, as well as the www1 meltdown the previous day. So I had to do enough back-pedaling to smooth their ruffled feathers.
But to put all this in perspective though, we should examine the other side of the coin too. To get extra DNS servers, staff to send out email messages, to update the website in a timely fashion, to create better documentation, and to handle the graveyard shift, (since the Japanese working hours are out of whack with the European and the US working hours) etc, costs quite a sum of money.
In the current economic climate, in which everyone is trying to run lean and mean organizations, how would you like to be paying let's say 50 to 80 Euros per month for that Premium PBXes account, instead of just 10 Euros? You would have all the above mentioned bells and whistles, for 5 to 8 times the amount of money you pay now per month.
Because a simple email or a forum post takes some time to prepare, and what would you have the technical people do first? Do everything they can to identify the issue, communicate with the right people to discuss it and fix it, or prepare an email and send it to the 32747 account holders, and in addition update the website?
Everything takes time or money to do. Most of the times it takes both. We are all here because we don't want to host our own PBX service, deal with the viruses, attacks, upgrade and maintenance issues of running our own telephony server, for a really good price. In return, we are getting a stable platform, with a no frills website to slow down our browsers (except on the first page where FlashBlock is a godsend), no ITSP attachments of any kind where you can setup your existing ITSPs, and six geographically separated servers to minimize delays and provide real-time backup if you are willing to invest in a second PBXes account.
We get no coherent A-Z documentation, but a forum we have to search through, with a few good people willing to help us along, most of the time. There is however a paid support option where anyone can arrange to talk to a human, and that option is available on selected regular support cases as well.
Regarding the two issues you brought up, redundancy for the telephony servers as well as for the DNS servers, things are looking up. Following the current DNS issue, I am sure i-p-tel will be considering options for backup DNS servers. I have also mentioned on another related thread, a quite simple solution to setup an in-house DNS server, which would have helped tremendously during this outage.
As for building a redundant telephony solution using PBXes, this has been available since the time the 2nd and 3rd servers were put into production. With any SIP UA that supports more than one registration, there is a procedure where you can duplicate the setup of an existing account on another server. If one server goes down for any reason, the other one takes over with minimal to no downtime. I have mentioned this a couple of times in the past, and I will be glad to discuss it again, with anyone interested.
Let me know what you think, and consider that RAID which is quite popular in our days, stands for Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks. A second PBXes account with a home or office DNS offers similar inexpensive protection.
|
|
10.10.2009 03:16 |
|
i-p
Super Moderator
Registration Date: 14.01.2006
Posts: 4775
|
|
|
10.10.2009 03:26 |
|
gio
Registration Date: 01.01.1970
Posts:
|
|
|
10.10.2009 09:44 |
|
i-p
Super Moderator
Registration Date: 14.01.2006
Posts: 4775
|
|
|
10.10.2009 14:14 |
|
i-p
Super Moderator
Registration Date: 14.01.2006
Posts: 4775
|
|
|
10.10.2009 15:28 |
|
bob
Registration Date: 01.01.1970
Posts:
|
|
|
11.10.2009 14:58 |
|
i-p
Super Moderator
Registration Date: 14.01.2006
Posts: 4775
|
|
|
11.10.2009 16:34 |
|
i-p
Super Moderator
Registration Date: 14.01.2006
Posts: 4775
|
|
|
11.10.2009 17:16 |
|
bob
Registration Date: 01.01.1970
Posts:
|
|
RE: Phone can't connect to PBXes - www down as well? |
|
Zitat: |
Originally posted by i-p-tel
@bobmats
The old discussion was about adding an article on Wikipedia about PBXes. You were opposing this. By doing so in the public you efficiently stopped the project.
Now imagine we had such an article. In the case of the DNS outage everybody could have added an info about the outage there, as a second source to the forum.
Do you ever see the positive aspects of what we are doing here? |
|
Wikipedia is very clear what they allow and what they don't allow. Wikipedia is meant as information and is not meant to be used as a platform to promote a commercial service. Your service is still a commercial service and although you have free accounts they can only p\be possible by paid accounts.
The wike article would have been stopped anyhow because of these rules. So please stop blaming me for that. If you were than convinced that wikipedia is the right page for you you can still start a page and see what will happen.
I think I said I would love to have a page about my company and I have seen of of my competitors make one and got deleted very fast. The only information you see about a company is on bigger importnat companies, take apple, google, ibm and even than this is general information. wikipedia would never even allow you to post information on how to use your service, that is not what wikipedia is about. You can dislike this, but those are not my rules. By opposing the wiki articel is was just opposing it for good ground and it would have been stopped otherwise.
If you want to make a wiki, just buy the domain pbxeswiki.com.
Now you even suggest that i am to blame that there was not a second page where people could have found this information.
Back to the facts. Your dns failed because of a ddos attack, not your mistake. You did not have a dns server from a different company that would have enabled everyone to access the pages. This is your mistake not mine, but everyone makes mistakes and now you learned and have as you wrote dns servers from other companies..
You say imagine we would have such an article, fact is you don't even have an atricle on this on pbxes and yes you gave a guide how to do it when the problem was solved.
So who is here to blame ?. My opinion is that you time after time prove that you are a very difficult person to communicate with. It did not came in your mind to post a message on the forum yourself how to solve the problem by replacing the domains with ip addresses and giving the ipadresses for www1 2 3 .
Now it's somewhere in the forum written down and I hope that there will never be a problem like this again.
But to start you might want to write this down in your help section.
It does bring to my mind another potential problem. What happens if one of your servers or the datacenter of on of your servers is under a direct ddos attack. It has not happened but it's one thing you hope will not happend but it could.
Say i am on www3 my account will be unusable and I am unable to login. Will my account be moved to a different server automatically. Since I can't login I can't do this myself.
Or what if the main server to which pbxes.com links is in a datacenter under ddos attack, what will happen than.
As said there are many possible problems, most will never happen but you could look at trying to find a solution in case some will happen. This will make your service even better and more reliable.
As for email yes this will not work under ddos attach, but also for this you can have a special domain dns hosted as a different company to solve that problem
Twitter can be great for this. Just checked pbxes is still free so I suggest you register twitter.com/pbxes very fast ;-)
--
Edited by moderator to remove offensive language. Second Warning! We do not tolerate offensive language in this public forum.
This post has been edited 1 time(s), it was last edited by i-p on 12.10.2009 at 00:26.
|
|
11.10.2009 20:22 |
|
dor
Registration Date: 01.01.1970
Posts:
|
|
|
23.10.2009 06:54 |
|
sol
Grünschnabel
Registration Date: 04.04.2008
Posts: 26
|
|
|
21.01.2010 01:06 |
|
Dia
Premium Account
Registration Date: 03.03.2006
Posts: 1443
|
|
|
21.01.2010 01:54 |
|
sol
Grünschnabel
Registration Date: 04.04.2008
Posts: 26
|
|
|
21.01.2010 02:05 |
|
Dia
Premium Account
Registration Date: 03.03.2006
Posts: 1443
|
|
|
21.01.2010 02:31 |
|
sol
Grünschnabel
Registration Date: 04.04.2008
Posts: 26
|
|
|
21.01.2010 02:32 |
|
Dia
Premium Account
Registration Date: 03.03.2006
Posts: 1443
|
|
RE: Phone can't connect to PBXes - www down as well? |
|
Dany,
What I have found to work over the years using PBXes, is simply using the FQDN of the server each account is hosted on.
SIP UAs (IP-phones, ATAs, soft-phones) provisioned with the proper FQDN wwwX.pbxes{.}com without the square [] brackets and X=1,2,3,4,5,6, go through IP changes without a hitch most of the times. Stuck routers which propagate outdated DNS information are the culprit in the majority of the cases.
Having said that, using the IP instead of the proper FQDN is purely an emergency measure, to be used when and only when the authoritative DNS servers of the pbxes.com domain have dropped off the Internet.
Even when this rare case materializes, only once so far in the 4 year history of PBXes, there are resilient DNS servers which have cached the last good known IP addresses of our servers, thus you can get the server's IPs from them. OpenDNS's CacheCheck is such a service, which proved invaluable during the authoritative' DNS outage.
Having learnt from our shortcomings, we try to maintain the FQDN to IP list current in this support forum, after every change of an IP address. So as a conclusion, please refrain from using the actual IP addresses during normal circumstances. Using the proper FQDN just makes your life a lot easier, and with the advent of IPv6 much more saner too.
|
|
21.01.2010 03:27 |
|
i-p
Super Moderator
Registration Date: 14.01.2006
Posts: 4775
|
|
|
21.01.2010 11:17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|