Today I posted this experience at the Voxalot forum.
Quote
'Inbound forwarded calls are not coming through, they go straight to vm.
I forward my Budgetphone calls from my PBXes account to my Voxalot
account
(this detour I had to take after I wasn't able to receive budgetphone calls although I followed the procedure as described here VoXalot provider settings Budgetphone.nl and Voipbuster.com).
For a short while I was happy with the PBXes solution; I received my forwarded Budgetphone calls without any trouble.
But it doesn't work anymore. The inbound Budgetphone calls go straight to vm.
The same thing happens when using MySipSwitch.
My ATA only rings when Budgetphone helpdesk forwards the calls to my Voxalot account.
I changed/unchanged registration details, forwarded/unforwarded ports, make use of a stun server, nothing helps.
Budgetphone tells me there were no system changes at their side lately.
Does anyone have maybe the same experience or does anyone know of any system/protocol change at the Voxalot side?
Thanks!
Unquote
At that time I didn;t know that the calls are only rejected when there's no CID.
I tried out a few things, a.o. forwarding calls directly to my ATA as well as to my Voxalot account.
With CID the calls came through, without CID they didn't.
I want to receive inbound calls and I also want to decide myself to block the calls without CID or not.
Can anyone help me out, there has to be changed something somewhere, but what?
Thanks!
I only want to register one account to my ATA so
I need Voxalot, not only for receiving (forwarded) calls but I also use Voxalot to make calls with Betamax without the FUP problem.
I would've wanted to be able to only use PBXes for all these functions but the FUP issue with Betamax is still there icw PBXes....
14.12.08
The anonymous calls aren't rejected anymore.
I think my PAP2T was blocking the anonymous calls after all.
After a tip of emoci from the Voxalot forum,
I activated and deactivated the ANC block serv. in my ATA and everyone, with or without CID can reach me again.
This case is closed, thank you all.
This post has been edited 2 time(s), it was last edited by 280 on 14.12.2008 at 12:54.