Talk:Faq - Revision history

bobpaul: /* classical extension */ clarrified extension terminology

bobpaul — Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:37:58 GMT

classical extension - clarrified extension terminology

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:37, 22 April 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I'm kind of new to PBXes.org, so I don't know a WHOLE lot. But it seems to me an extension is NOT "on a trunk." An extension is just an extension; it's not associated with a trunk. A call ''from a trunk'' may be ''routed to'' an extension, but it's not on the trunk itself, is it?		I'm kind of new to PBXes.org, so I don't know a WHOLE lot. But it seems to me an extension is NOT "on a trunk." An extension is just an extension; it's not associated with a trunk. A call ''from a trunk'' may be ''routed to'' an extension, but it's not on the trunk itself, is it?
		+
		+	:: A "Classical Extension" is a PTSN phone number. In order to reach PTSN, you need a Trunk. That's why the sentence says "An extension on a Trunk is a Classical Extension". This differs from a SIP extension which does not need a trunk. Technically you could setup PBXes with several SIP extensions, no trunks, and just call from 1 extension to the other. Also, please sign future comments with 4 tildes [[User:bobpaul\|bobpaul]] 19:37, 22 April 2020 (CEST)

rchandra — Sun, 07 Nov 2010 15:45:29 GMT

classical extension

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:45, 7 November 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Sorry, but can't you write comprehensibly for not informatics how could be enum check (trunk?) done? And most of all why it is not automatic?		Sorry, but can't you write comprehensibly for not informatics how could be enum check (trunk?) done? And most of all why it is not automatic?
		+
		+	== classical extension ==
		+
		+	I'm kind of new to PBXes.org, so I don't know a WHOLE lot. But it seems to me an extension is NOT "on a trunk." An extension is just an extension; it's not associated with a trunk. A call ''from a trunk'' may be ''routed to'' an extension, but it's not on the trunk itself, is it?

mattformabove — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:53:26 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:53, 3 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What about reveiving sip calls? IE, use gizmo or fwd and call user@pbxes.org or user-100@pbxes.org? Can that be set up?		What about reveiving sip calls? IE, use gizmo or fwd and call user@pbxes.org or user-100@pbxes.org? Can that be set up?
		+
		+	Sorry, but can't you write comprehensibly for not informatics how could be enum check (trunk?) done? And most of all why it is not automatic?

bobpaul — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 04:08:12 GMT

New page: What about reveiving sip calls? IE, use gizmo or fwd and call user@pbxes.org or user-100@pbxes.org? Can that be set up?

New page

What about reveiving sip calls? IE, use gizmo or fwd and call user@pbxes.org or user-100@pbxes.org? Can that be set up?