RE: Different receptionist for different DID's 02.01.2013 22:29

Forum: Queues, Digital Receptionist, Faxmail, Voicemail and Ring Groups

I asked Callcentric if it was possible and they responded:

"What you can try would be to perform DID-based routing (http://www.callcentric.com/support/device/did_trixbox) or (http://www.callcentric.com/support/device/did_routing). Depending on which Asterisk variant is being used, you may use our DID-based routing guides to assist you in routing your calls based on the DID which was called."

RE: Multiple Phones/Devices on one single extension? 21.12.2012 20:34

Forum: Miscellaneous

Yeah, let me know. I've tried it before, and I didn't think it worked.
I'll try again when I get to work.

Thanks.

RE: Two Things (Multiple Phone Numbers and G729) 21.12.2012 20:31

Forum: Miscellaneous

Dang it.
Well, that's alright, I can just order a new DID and make a new account for each DID via Callcentric.
It's messy, but it'll work.

Call Recording (On-Demand) 19.12.2012 01:04

Forum: Feature Requests

Using call recording on-demand, only activates the recording for one side of the conversation. While if I set it to ALWAYS Record, then it records both sides. Also, I'm guessing dialing *1 a second time after the recording has been initiated, it would cease recording, correct?

Lastly, is there any way to set up these recordings to go to an email or anything, I think throwing them into "Call Monitor" is a bit archaic, and cumbersome to retrieve.

RE: Different receptionist for different DID's 19.12.2012 01:02

Forum: Queues, Digital Receptionist, Faxmail, Voicemail and Ring Groups

I'm looking to do the same thing, have different receptions for each number. Is this possible; even if all the numbers are on the same trunk (in my case, Callcentric)?

I couldn't find a way to "intercept" the DIDs like you mentioned.

Any help you can give me would be super cool.

Thank you .

RE: Multiple Phones/Devices on one single extension? 11.12.2012 01:54

Forum: Miscellaneous

Yeah, that would work just fine; still messier than the alternative. But it'll do. I'll come up with a naming mechanism to make it make sense.

Thanks for your help. I never really saw the call forking option.

G729 Caveats? 10.12.2012 19:21

Forum: Miscellaneous

So, I bought the G729 Transcoding option, and it said something about only having one simultaneous call going while using the G729 Protocol. What exactly does that mean, I can't put people on hold and take another call? Or does that just mean the second call will be a different codec while the on hold call will still be G729? Also, does that apply to the PBX as a whole (the one stream limitation), or does that apply to just the extension using the G729 codec?

Thank you .

RE: Multiple Phones/Devices on one single extension? 10.12.2012 19:11

Forum: Miscellaneous

Yeah, from what I've read, it's what is "supposed" to happen on a lot of Asterisk-based PBXs, but I believe, if programmed, you could log into the same extension on multiple phones. I think FreePBX has this feature, and a few proprietary ones do as well.

I simply wasn't sure if it was was possible to somehow enable this behavior on PBXes, so I figured I'd ask around as it would be a very helpful feature, really.

Multiple Phones/Devices on one single extension? 10.12.2012 07:30

Forum: Miscellaneous

Is this possible with PBXes?
I know, technically, it's possible on others. But after trying it on here, it seems to just switch to the latest device registered with it. I can think of a couple cool uses for the feature, but I'm guessing its not implemented here? Just thought I'd ask in case I was missing something.

Thanks.

Multiple Incoming Phone Numbers 09.12.2012 01:55

Forum: Miscellaneous

I have two DID numbers with Callcentric. I want to Inbound Route these two numbers to different extensions. Is that not possible? Does Callcentric not differentiate between what number is being dialed in to it's service? Or am I missing something?

(Ignore the G729 comment in the subject, I separated that question into a different thread)

Thanks :).